SUBJECT: Tracking Progress: Examining the Department of Defense's Financial Management Practices
DATE: September 24, 2024
OVERVIEW: The Subcommittee on Government Operations and Federal Workforce convened on behalf of the Department of Defense (DOD) to evaluate the repeated failures of the organization to achieve clean audits during financial management practices. Discussions focused on systemic weaknesses in financial reporting, the impact of outdated systems, and potential solutions to enhance accountability and efficiency in managing over $850 billion in annual discretionary funding.
HEARING RECORDING LINK: https://oversight.house.gov/hearing/tracking-progress-examining-the-department-of-defenses-financial-management-practices/
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Witnesses
- Mr. Tom Steffens, Senior Assistant to the Comptroller, U.S. Department of Defense
- Mr. Brett Mansfield, Deputy Inspector General for Audit, U.S. Department of Defense Office of the Inspector General
- Mr. Asif Khan, Director, Financial Management Assurance, U.S. Government Accountability Office
Key Themes & Highlights
- Republican Concerns:
- "Accountability Deficits: Highlighted the DoD’s inability to meet audit standards, pointing to persistent management failures that undermine public confidence. Republicans criticized inefficiencies in leadership and financial systems, which exacerbate waste and compromise the use of taxpayer dollars.
- Outdated Systems: Republicans raised concerns about legacy systems from the 1970s and 1980s still being used by the DoD. These systems are inadequate for modern financial accountability and create bottlenecks for comprehensive audit compliance.
- Mismanagement of Contracts: The hearing noted cases of questionable contract practices, including excessive spending on remediation efforts that fail to address core issues. Republicans advocated for stricter oversight of contracting and procurement practices.
- Democratic Concerns:
- Leadership Accountability: Democrats emphasized the need for strong leadership to drive systemic reform in financial management. They stressed that tone at the top, such as that seen in the Marine Corps, is essential for successful audit outcomes.
- Impact on Social Programs: Democrats criticized the DoD's financial inefficiency for its potential impact on broader federal budgets. They suggested that funds lost to wasteful practices could be redirected to underfunded programs like education, infrastructure, and childcare.
- Security vs Civil Liberties: Democrats and witnesses, testified to concerns of growing financial spending among the defense sector in democratic governance, with Brett Mansfield stating the needs and prioritization of national security lay at risk the federal government and national treasury's capacity to ensure other indiviual freedoms to the nation.
- Witness Testimonies:
- Mr. Tom Steffens: Described efforts to modernize financial systems and streamline remediation processes. He highlighted lessons from the Marine Corps’ successful audit and underscored the interdependencies between departments and systems in achieving financial transparency.
- Dr. Brett Mansfield: Provided insights into persistent material weaknesses within the DoD’s financial systems, particularly regarding legacy technologies. He emphasized the importance of clear requirements and accountability in procurement processes to address inefficiencies.
- Mr. Asif Khan: Compared the audit process to a detailed game analysis, stressing the long-term benefits of financial transparency. He pointed out deficiencies in the DoD’s internal controls and urged leadership engagement to achieve comprehensive audit compliance.
- Contentious Points:
- Republicans: Advocated for reducing inefficiencies in legacy systems and stricter oversight on contract management to achieve fiscal accountability.
- Democrats: Emphasized the need for leadership accountability and prioritized reinvestment of saved funds into social programs and federal initiatives.
- Key Discussions:
- Audit Roadblocks: Identified material weaknesses and outdated systems as primary barriers to financial accountability, with both parties advocating for clearer goals and timely implementation of reforms.
- Leadership and Cultural Change: Both parties agreed that sustained leadership commitment and cultural change within the DoD are essential to achieving a clean audit opinion by the mandated 2028 deadline.
- Impact of Legacy Systems: Extensive discussions revolved around the DoD’s reliance on antiquated systems that complicate financial reporting and operational efficiency.
In-Depth Notes
- Chairman James Comer opened the hearing by calling out the DoD's lack of accountability in failing to meet audit standards for over five years. Criticized leadership for not prioritizing reforms and questioned the continued reliance on legacy systems.
- Ranking member Gerry Connolly, stressed the importance of leadership in achieving meaningful reform and cited examples from the private sector where top-down accountability improved financial management. Suggested reallocating wasteful spending to social programs like education and housing.
- Representative Andy Biggs pointed to specific cases of mismanagement, such as excessive spending on remediation contracts, and called for immediate oversight measures to prevent further financial losses.
- Representative Katie Porter criticized the inefficiencies in DoD procurement processes, citing a lack of transparency in spending. She questioned whether existing controls could realistically prevent fraud and waste without significant reforms.
- Representative Byron Donalds highlighted the fiscal irresponsibility of the DoD’s outdated systems, comparing their inefficiencies to private-sector standards. Called for an overhaul of legacy technologies to improve financial tracking and accountability.